Back to reviews and guides

Accessibility in Healthcare: Improving Access to Digital Health Services

A practical guide to improving digital health access in the UK: it outlines common barriers, legal and technical standards, and step-by-step actions for design, procurement and monitoring. Includes quick wins, a clinical pathway mapping method and simple metrics to measure progress.

Why accessible digital healthcare matters

Digital services are now core to care delivery. When platforms, apps and telehealth exclude people with sensory, cognitive, motor or connectivity needs, patients face missed appointments, poorer outcomes and extra burden on clinicians. This page focuses on practical steps teams can use to improve access across clinical pathways, procurement and ongoing monitoring.

Common barriers include:

  • Sensory: poor contrast, missing captions or alt text
  • Cognitive: complex language and cluttered forms
  • Motor: small buttons or time-limited tasks
  • Technical: pages that break with assistive tech or slow connections

In the UK, accessibility sits alongside equality duties. International guidance such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) informs technical design and testing. Meeting these standards reduces legal risk and improves usability for everyone.

Practical steps for providers: design, procurement and the patient pathway

This section gives hands-on actions teams can adopt now, split by activity.

1. Map patient journeys for accessibility

Identify every digital touchpoint in a clinical pathway (booking, triage, remote consultation, results). For each touchpoint:

  • Note user groups at risk (e.g. low vision, limited literacy)
  • Record the assistive tech they use (screen readers, voice control)
  • Assign a risk score and quick remediation target

2. Design and testing practices

  • Start with plain language and clear navigation — fewer choices per screen
  • Follow semantic markup and keyboard focus order so assistive tech can read content
  • Include real users in testing: recruit a small, diverse panel and test common tasks

3. Telehealth and clinical workflows

  • Offer multiple contact modes: telephone, video with captions, asynchronous messaging
  • Allow extended appointment times and advance test runs for people using assistive tech
  • Provide accessible pre-consultation materials (easy-read summaries, translated guides)

4. Procurement and supplier oversight

Build accessibility into contracts:

  • Ask for WCAG conformance evidence and user test reports
  • Specify remediation timelines and acceptance tests for updates
  • Include accessibility KPIs in supplier reviews

5. Quick wins checklist (low cost, high impact)

  • Increase contrast and font size options — implementation time: hours to days
  • Add descriptive alt text to images used in care instructions — hours
  • Enable captions or transcripts for recorded consultations — days
  • Ensure all forms are keyboard-reachable and label inputs clearly — days

6. Measurement and continuous improvement

Track a small set of metrics that signal real accessibility issues:

  • Task completion rates from accessibility user tests
  • Support contacts about access problems (categorised)
  • Automated coverage for WCAG checkpoints plus periodic manual audits

Use anonymised analytics to spot drop-off points in booking or triage flows and prioritise fixes where real patients fail to complete care tasks.

Conclusion

Improving digital access is a mix of design discipline, testing with real users and contractual requirements. Start by mapping pathways, apply a few quick wins, and embed monitoring so improvements are sustained. Inclusive digital services reduce harm and make care more efficient for patients and staff.

FAQs

What is the first thing we should do?

Map the patient journey to find where digital services block access — that reveals the highest-impact fixes.

How do we test accessibility without a big budget?

Run short task-based sessions with a small, diverse group of users and combine those insights with focused automated scans.

Which standards matter most?

WCAG provides technical checkpoints; local equality duties also apply. Use standards to guide design and to set contractual acceptance tests.

Can small trusts make meaningful change quickly?

Yes. Targeted quick wins (contrast, captions, labelled forms) and a simple monitoring loop deliver visible improvements fast.